Mathai M Paikeday vs C.K.Anthony

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether the respondent qualifies as an indigent person under Order 44 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The Court held that the High Court must conduct a proper inquiry as mandated by Order 33 Rule 1A before allowing a party to proceed as an indigent person. The Supreme Court remanded the case for a fresh inquiry, emphasizing the need for transparency regarding the respondent's financial means, particularly in light of his pension and additional income from his son.