Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-07-26

Narmada Bachao Andolan vs State Of M.P

Citation / case number
AIR 2011 SUPREME COURT 3199
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Narmada Bachao Andolan
Respondent
State Of M.P
Author
B.S. Chauhan
Bench
J.M. Panchal, Deepak Verma, B.S. Chauhan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Madhya Pradesh High Court's decision regarding the validity of the amendment to the Resettlement and Rehabilitation Policy, 1991, stating that the challenge was belated and that the alternative remedy before the Grievance Redressal Authority (GRA) was adequate. The Court emphasized that landless labourers are not entitled to agricultural land allotment under the policy and that the oustees had been offered grants as per the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's directions for the completion of the dam construction.

Narmada Bachao Andolan vs State Of M.P · Niyam