Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-07-04

Commissioner Of Customs, Calcutta vs G.C. Jain & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2011 SUPREME COURT 2262
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Commissioner Of Customs, Calcutta
Respondent
G.C. Jain & Anr
Author
Mukundakam Sharma
Bench
Anil R. Dave, Mukundakam Sharma

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, which ruled that Butyl Acrylate Monomer (BAM) qualifies as an adhesive under the relevant customs notifications, specifically Notification Nos. 203/92 and 79/95. The Court emphasized that BAM, while not adhesive in its monomer form, becomes an adhesive upon polymerization, thus justifying the use of advance licenses for its import. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal's finding that the classification of BAM was appropriate under the DEEC scheme.

Commissioner Of Customs, Calcutta vs G.C. Jain & Anr · Niyam