Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-07-28

Gr.Hydrabad Mun.Corp vs M.Prabhakar Rao

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Gr.Hydrabad Mun.Corp
Respondent
M.Prabhakar Rao
Author
A. K. Patnaik
Bench
A. K. Patnaik, R.V. Raveendran

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal regarding the entitlement of the respondent to back-wages and consequential benefits during his suspension period. The Court noted that under F.R. 54-B, the competent authority has discretion in determining the justification of suspension, and since the respondent was acquitted of bribery charges due to hostile witnesses, the Tribunal's order to treat the suspension period as on duty was justified. The appeal against the High Court's dismissal of the writ petition was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal's ruling.

Gr.Hydrabad Mun.Corp vs M.Prabhakar Rao · Niyam