Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-01-28

PARMESHWARI vs AMIR CHAND .

Citation / case number
SC 2010/8318
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
PARMESHWARI
Respondent
AMIR CHAND .
Author
ASOK KUMAR GANGULY G.S. SINGHVI
Bench
ASOK KUMAR GANGULY G.S. SINGHVI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award of Rs.1,36,547 under the Motor Vehicles Act was justified based on the evidence of witnesses and medical reports, including a 32% permanent disability assessment. The Court found that the High Court erred in setting aside the Tribunal's decision solely on the absence of the SSP's testimony, emphasizing that the evidence presented was sufficient to establish the claim. The Court reinstated the Tribunal's award, affirming the compensation amount and interest rate.

PARMESHWARI vs AMIR CHAND . · Niyam