SUSHILA DIGAMBAR NAIK vs MAHARASHTRA HOUSING & AR.DEV.AUTHY.

The Supreme Court recorded a settlement between the appellants and the fifth respondent-developer regarding the development of property, wherein the developer agreed to provide larger flats than originally contracted. The Court held that all parties, including the fourth respondent-Society, accepted the revised terms, which included a timeline for construction and compensation for delays. The appeal was disposed of, allowing enforcement of the settlement as a decree in case of any breach.