Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-01-14

STATE OF U.P. vs CHHOTEYLAL

Citation / case number
SC 2004/3194
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF U.P.
Respondent
CHHOTEYLAL
Author
AFTAB ALAM,R.M. LODHA, , ,
Bench
AFTAB ALAM,R.M. LODHA, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the acquittal of A-1 under Sections 363, 366, 368, and 376 IPC, where the High Court reversed the trial court's conviction citing a ten-day delay in lodging the FIR without reasonable explanation. The Court emphasized the importance of prompt reporting in sexual assault cases and held that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. Consequently, the acquittal by the High Court was upheld, reinforcing the principle that delay in reporting can undermine the credibility of the prosecution's case.

STATE OF U.P. vs CHHOTEYLAL · Niyam