Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-01-13

ARUNDHATI ASHOK WALAVALKAR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Citation / case number
SC 2004/16164
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ARUNDHATI ASHOK WALAVALKAR
Respondent
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Author
MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
Bench
MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA,ANIL R. DAVE, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the imposition of compulsory retirement on the appellant under Rule 5(1)(vii) of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1979, for repeated incidents of travelling without a ticket and misconduct as per Rule 3(iii) of the Maharashtra Civil Services Conduct Rules, 1979. The Court found that the appellant's behavior, including asserting that Magistrates need not have tickets, constituted grave misconduct unbecoming of a judicial officer. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the disciplinary authority's decision.

ARUNDHATI ASHOK WALAVALKAR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA · Niyam