Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-01-27

S.R. SUNIL & CO. vs D. SRINIVASAVARADAN

Citation / case number
SC 2004/11861
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
S.R. SUNIL & CO.
Respondent
D. SRINIVASAVARADAN
Author
HARJIT SINGH BEDI,CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, , ,
Bench
HARJIT SINGH BEDI,CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court emphasized that the bouncing of a cheque is a serious offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, necessitating a sentence that reflects the gravity of the situation. The Court noted that despite the principal amount being paid, the accused failed to pay the promised interest, leading to a prolonged delay of 15 years without any effort to settle the matter. Consequently, the Court imposed a fine of Rs. 5,38,425/- and a default sentence of two years simple imprisonment if the payment is not made by the end of March 2011.

S.R. SUNIL & CO. vs D. SRINIVASAVARADAN · Niyam