Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-01-13

M/S. USHA RECTIFIER CORPN.(I) LTD. vs COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI

Citation / case number
SC 2000/18206
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. USHA RECTIFIER CORPN.(I) LTD.
Respondent
COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI
Author
MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
Bench
MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA,ANIL R. DAVE, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that under Section 3 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, excise duty is applicable only when there is a clear act of manufacture or production. The Court held that the appellant's activities did not constitute manufacture as they were primarily for research and development, and thus, the demand for excise duty of Rs. 4,92,566.28 was unjustified. The Court set aside the orders of the lower authorities, including the CEGAT, confirming the duty and penalty imposed on the appellant.

M/S. USHA RECTIFIER CORPN.(I) LTD. vs COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI · Niyam