Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-01-17

Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd vs Dhanbai Kanji Gadhvi & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2011 SUPREME COURT 1138
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd
Respondent
Dhanbai Kanji Gadhvi & Ors
Bench
H. L. Gokhale, J.M. Panchal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision affirming the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's order allowing the respondents to proceed with their application under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, despite having received compensation under Section 163A. The Court established that both proceedings under Sections 163A and 166 are permissible and a claimant can opt for either, provided the application under Section 166 is filed before the award is passed. The Court dismissed the petitioner's challenge, affirming the Tribunal's directive to adjust the amount awarded under Section 163A against any final award under Section 166.

Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd vs Dhanbai Kanji Gadhvi & Ors · Niyam