Sushila Digambar Naik & Ors vs Maharashtra Housing & Ar.Dev.Authy& ...

The Supreme Court upheld the order of summary eviction against the appellants under Section 95A of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976, affirming the legality of the redevelopment agreement between the Society and the developer. The Court emphasized that the appellants, as non-cooperating members, were bound by the decisions of the majority and the terms of the redevelopment agreement. The Court also noted the developer's offer to enhance the flat sizes for all members, including the appellants, as a resolution to the dispute, contingent upon their vacating the premises within six weeks.