Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-01-13

Arundhati Ashok Walavalkar vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Arundhati Ashok Walavalkar
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra & Anr
Author
Mukundakam Sharma
Bench
Anil R. Dave, Mukundakam Sharma

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the imposition of compulsory retirement on the appellant under Rule 5(1)(vii) of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1979, for repeated instances of travelling without a ticket and misconduct as defined under Rule 3(iii) of the Maharashtra Civil Services Conduct Rules, 1979. The Court found that the appellant's behavior, including asserting that Magistrates need not have tickets and threatening Railway staff, constituted grave misconduct unbecoming of a judicial officer. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the disciplinary authority's decision.

Arundhati Ashok Walavalkar vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr · Niyam