Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-02-28

DHOOPARAM(D) TR.LRS. vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN .

Citation / case number
SC 2010/13298
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
DHOOPARAM(D) TR.LRS.
Respondent
STATE OF RAJASTHAN .
Author
HARJIT SINGH BEDI,CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, , ,
Bench
HARJIT SINGH BEDI,CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court set aside the previous judgment, clarifying that the decision was based on the statement made by the learned Additional Advocate General and does not reflect on the merits of the case. The court disposed of the appeal without addressing the substantive issues involved. This ruling emphasizes the importance of procedural fairness and the role of statements made by counsel in judicial determinations.

DHOOPARAM(D) TR.LRS. vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN . · Niyam