Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-02-10

HARYANA STATE AGRI.MARKET.BOARD vs RAJ PAL

Citation / case number
SC 2009/7367
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HARYANA STATE AGRI.MARKET.BOARD
Respondent
RAJ PAL
Author
R.V. RAVEENDRAN,A.K. PATNAIK, , ,
Bench
R.V. RAVEENDRAN,A.K. PATNAIK, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board (Sale of Immovable Property) Rules 1997, particularly Rule 4, which mandates completion of construction within two years of allotment. The Court upheld the validity of the auction process and the terms of payment outlined in the auction notice and allotment letters, emphasizing that failure to comply with the payment schedule could lead to forfeiture of earnest money. The Court ruled in favor of the appellants, affirming the auction process and the conditions set forth by the Board.

HARYANA STATE AGRI.MARKET.BOARD vs RAJ PAL · Niyam