Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-02-23

MEHMOOD RAHMAT ULLAH KHAN vs NIYAZ AHMAD KHAN

Citation / case number
SC 2008/9169
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MEHMOOD RAHMAT ULLAH KHAN
Respondent
NIYAZ AHMAD KHAN
Author
MARKANDEY KATJU,GYAN SUDHA MISRA, , ,
Bench
MARKANDEY KATJU,GYAN SUDHA MISRA, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Urban Buildings Act, 1972, a High Court cannot interfere with findings of fact regarding the bonafide need of a landlord for eviction of a tenant. The Court emphasized that the prescribed authority's role is limited to allowing or refusing eviction petitions and does not extend to enhancing rent. Consequently, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment that increased the rent, upholding the appellate court's rejection of the landlord's petition for eviction.

MEHMOOD RAHMAT ULLAH KHAN vs NIYAZ AHMAD KHAN · Niyam