Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-02-10

RAVINDER RAJ vs M/S. COMPETENT MOTORS CO. PVT. LTD.&ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 2005/23369
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAVINDER RAJ
Respondent
M/S. COMPETENT MOTORS CO. PVT. LTD.&ANR.
Author
ALTAMAS KABIR,CYRIAC JOSEPH, , ,
Bench
ALTAMAS KABIR,CYRIAC JOSEPH, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of liability for increased excise duty in the context of a car purchase agreement. The Court held that the petitioner, who had booked a Maruti Car and paid the initial amount, should not bear the increased excise duty as the delay in delivery was not his fault. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's order reversing the State Forum's decision was set aside, affirming the petitioner's claim that the respondents should absorb the price increase due to excise duty.

RAVINDER RAJ vs M/S. COMPETENT MOTORS CO. PVT. LTD.&ANR. · Niyam