Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-02-17

KHAJA SHARIFF vs B.H.E.L., HYDERABAD

Citation / case number
SC 2004/6792
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
KHAJA SHARIFF
Respondent
B.H.E.L., HYDERABAD
Author
DALVEER BHANDARI,MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, , ,
Bench
DALVEER BHANDARI,MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Andhra Pradesh High Court held that a writ appeal is maintainable when an order re-determines the valuable rights of the parties, as established in Khimji's case. The Court found that the learned Single Judge's dismissal of the review petition warranted a reasoned order for the writ appeal. Consequently, the impugned judgment was set aside, and the matter was remitted to the High Court for a decision in accordance with law, emphasizing the need for expeditious disposal without expressing any opinion on the merits.

KHAJA SHARIFF vs B.H.E.L., HYDERABAD · Niyam