Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-02-14

Tej Bir & Anr vs State Of Haryana & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2012 SUPREME COURT 943
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Tej Bir & Anr
Respondent
State Of Haryana & Anr
Bench
Asok Kumar Ganguly, G.S. Singhvi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in quashing the charges against Kewal Kishan under Section 120B/307 IPC and Sections 27/30 of the Arms Act, emphasizing that the stage of framing charges requires consideration of the entire evidence, not just the F.I.R. The Court reiterated that the High Court should not exercise its revisional powers to quash charges without a comprehensive examination of the evidence. The judgment of the High Court was set aside, and the matter was remanded for further proceedings.

Tej Bir & Anr vs State Of Haryana & Anr · Niyam