Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-02-10

Haryana State Agri.Market.Board & Anr vs Raj Pal

Citation / case number
AIR 2011 SUPREME COURT 1394
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Haryana State Agri.Market.Board & Anr
Respondent
Raj Pal
Author
R.V.Raveendran
Bench
A.K. Patnaik, R.V. Raveendran

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of the auction process conducted by the Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board under the Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board (Sale of Immovable Property) Rules 1997. The Court held that the conditions stipulated in the auction notice, particularly regarding the deposit of the bid amount and the timeline for payment, are binding on the bidders. The Court emphasized that failure to comply with these conditions could lead to forfeiture of the earnest money, thereby upholding the Board's authority to enforce its rules and conditions.

Haryana State Agri.Market.Board & Anr vs Raj Pal · Niyam