Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-02-24

Md.Sukur Ali vs State Of Assam

Citation / case number
AIR 2011 SUPREME COURT 1222
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Md.Sukur Ali
Respondent
State Of Assam
Bench
Gyan Sudha Misra, Markandey Katju

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that in criminal cases, if the counsel for the accused does not appear, the court should not decide the case against the accused without representation. The court emphasized that the absence of counsel, whether due to negligence or other reasons, should not result in prejudice to the accused, as the right to legal representation is fundamental to ensuring justice. The court invoked Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees the protection of life and personal liberty, affirming that the liberty of an individual is paramount. The court directed that an amicus curiae should be appointed to defend the accused in such situations.

Md.Sukur Ali vs State Of Assam · Niyam