Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-02-17

Khaja Shariff & Ors vs B.H.E.L., Hyderabad

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Khaja Shariff & Ors
Respondent
B.H.E.L., Hyderabad
Bench
Mukundakam Sharma, Dalveer Bhandari

Judgment text excerpt

The Andhra Pradesh High Court held that a writ appeal is maintainable against an order that re-determines the valuable rights of the parties, as established in paragraph 53 of the judgment referencing Khimji's case. The Court found that the learned Single Judge's dismissal of the review petition warranted a reasoned order for the writ appeal. Consequently, the impugned judgment was set aside, and the matter was remitted to the High Court for a decision on the writ appeal in accordance with law, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

Khaja Shariff & Ors vs B.H.E.L., Hyderabad · Niyam