Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-12-15

YOGRAJ INFRAS.LTD. vs SSANG YONG ENGINEERING & CONSTRN.CO.LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2010/28014
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
YOGRAJ INFRAS.LTD.
Respondent
SSANG YONG ENGINEERING & CONSTRN.CO.LTD.
Author
ALTAMAS KABIR
Bench
CYRIAC JOSEPH ALTAMAS KABIR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court clarified its earlier judgment regarding the application of the SIAC Rules and the International Arbitration Act, 2002, in arbitration proceedings. It was established that while the SIAC Rules apply when the seat of arbitration is in Singapore, the governing law is the International Arbitration Act, 2002, as per Rule 32 of the SIAC Rules. The Court allowed corrections to be made in the judgment to reflect this understanding accurately, particularly in paragraphs 35 and 37, and addressed an inadvertent error regarding the party that filed an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

YOGRAJ INFRAS.LTD. vs SSANG YONG ENGINEERING & CONSTRN.CO.LTD. · Niyam