Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-12-09

RAMESH ROUT vs RABINDRA NATH ROUT

Citation / case number
SC 2010/20089
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAMESH ROUT
Respondent
RABINDRA NATH ROUT
Author
R.M. Lodha
Bench
JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR R.M. LODHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined appeals under Section 116A and Section 116C of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 regarding the rejection of nomination papers of a candidate for the 89-Athagarh Assembly constituency. The Court held that the Returning Officer's rejection of the proposed candidate's nomination due to improper signing of Forms A and B was unjustified, thereby establishing that proper adherence to nomination procedures is essential for fair electoral participation. The Court set aside the High Court's decision and directed that the proposed candidate's nomination be accepted, allowing him to contest the election.

RAMESH ROUT vs RABINDRA NATH ROUT · Niyam