Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-08-10

SAROJBEN ASHWINKUMAR SHAH ETC. vs STATE OF GUJARAT

Citation / case number
SC 2010/32426
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SAROJBEN ASHWINKUMAR SHAH ETC.
Respondent
STATE OF GUJARAT
Author
AFTAB ALAM,R.M. LODHA, , ,
Bench
AFTAB ALAM,R.M. LODHA, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the orders of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Prantij, allowing the addition of Paresh Lakshmikant Vyas and Sarojben Ashwinkumar Shah as Accused Nos. 4 and 5 under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Court emphasized that the addition of accused is permissible when evidence suggests their involvement in the offence, as established under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and Sections 420 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code. The Court affirmed the High Court's decision to maintain the Magistrate's order, reinforcing the principle that all parties involved in a financial transaction can be held accountable for dishonoured cheques.

SAROJBEN ASHWINKUMAR SHAH ETC. vs STATE OF GUJARAT · Niyam