Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-08-10

STATE OF U.P. vs PINTU @ ULAYATA

Citation / case number
SC 2007/15822
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF U.P.
Respondent
PINTU @ ULAYATA
Author
HARJIT SINGH BEDI,GYAN SUDHA MISRA, , ,
Bench
HARJIT SINGH BEDI,GYAN SUDHA MISRA, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the drawer of a cheque is liable for prosecution if the cheque is returned due to insufficient funds, provided that the payee has issued a notice within the stipulated time frame. The Court emphasized that the requirement of notice is a mandatory precondition for initiating proceedings under Section 138. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the conviction of the appellant for dishonor of cheque.

STATE OF U.P. vs PINTU @ ULAYATA · Niyam