Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-08-26

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs RAJ MARKETING

Citation / case number
SC 2007/13816
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Respondent
RAJ MARKETING
Author
H.L. GOKHALE P. SATHASIVAM
Bench
H.L. GOKHALE P. SATHASIVAM

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the products seized by the State of Maharashtra, including Candy man, Minto-Fresh, Kitchens of India, Badam Halwa, and Ashirvaad Atta, do not qualify as 'wholesale packages' under Rule 2(x) of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977. The Court affirmed the High Court's decision that these products did not meet the definition of wholesale packages intended for sale to intermediaries. Consequently, the appeal by the State was dismissed, upholding the High Court's order.

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs RAJ MARKETING · Niyam