Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-08-11

ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE vs R.K. UPPAL

Citation / case number
SC 2006/15415
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE
Respondent
R.K. UPPAL
Author
R.M. Lodha
Bench
AFTAB ALAM,R.M. LODHA, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed two key issues regarding the Oriental Bank of Commerce Officer Employees (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1982, specifically Regulation 17, which pertains to the necessity of a personal hearing in departmental appeals. The Court held that the appellate authority is indeed required to provide a personal hearing to the delinquent, and the absence of reasons in the appellate authority's order constituted a procedural infirmity. Consequently, the Court set aside the order of the appellate authority and remitted the matter for reconsideration, emphasizing the importance of fair procedure in disciplinary matters.

ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE vs R.K. UPPAL · Niyam