Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-08-17

Secy.,A.I.Pre-Med/Pre-Den.E.E.Cbse ... vs Khushboo Srivastava & Ors

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2011 SC 450
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Secy.,A.I.Pre-Med/Pre-Den.E.E.Cbse ...
Respondent
Khushboo Srivastava & Ors
Author
A. K. Patnaik
Bench
A. K. Patnaik, R. V. Raveendran

Judgment text excerpt

The Patna High Court held that under Article 226 of the Constitution, the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) must ensure fair evaluation of answer sheets. The Division Bench affirmed the Single Judge's finding that the respondent was entitled to two additional marks due to incorrect evaluation of her answers. Consequently, the court directed the CBSE to admit the respondent to the MBBS course for the next academic session, emphasizing that the delay in filing the appeal should not prejudice her right to relief.

Secy.,A.I.Pre-Med/Pre-Den.E.E.Cbse ... vs Khushboo Srivastava & Ors · Niyam