Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-08-29

Md.Murtaza & Ors vs State Of Assam & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2012 SC (CIVIL) 258
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Md.Murtaza & Ors
Respondent
State Of Assam & Ors
Bench
Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, Markandey Katju

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Gauhati High Court to relocate wholesale vegetable and fruit vendors from Machkhowa market to the outskirts of Gauhati, citing public interest concerns such as traffic congestion, health hazards, and pollution. The Court emphasized that while the right to do business is protected under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution, it is subject to reasonable restrictions as per Article 19(6). The judgment referenced the principles established in Friends Colony Development Committee vs. State of Orissa and Sales Tax Officer vs. Shree Durga Oil Mills, affirming that public interest prevails over private interests.

Md.Murtaza & Ors vs State Of Assam & Ors · Niyam