Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-08-26

State Of Maharashtra & Ors vs Raj Marketing & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2011 SUPREME COURT 3556
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of Maharashtra & Ors
Respondent
Raj Marketing & Anr
Author
P. Sathasivam
Bench
P. Sathasivam, H.L. Gokhale

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the products Candy man, Minto-Fresh, Kitchens of India, Badam Halwa, and Ashirvaad Atta do not qualify as 'wholesale packages' under Rule 2(x) of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977. The Court affirmed the High Court's decision that the packages failed to meet the necessary declarations required by Rule 29, including manufacturer details and retail sale price. Consequently, the appeal by the State of Maharashtra was dismissed, upholding the High Court's ruling.

State Of Maharashtra & Ors vs Raj Marketing & Anr · Niyam