A.C. MUTHIAH vs BD. OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIA

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision refusing to grant a mandatory temporary injunction under Clause 32(ii) of the BCCI Regulations, which sought to appoint a Commissioner for a preliminary inquiry against the Secretary of BCCI, respondent No. 2. The Court found that the amendments to Clause 6.2.4 of the BCCI Code, allowing administrators to have commercial interests in IPL, were valid. The Court held that the reliefs sought were not warranted, affirming the lower court's order and maintaining the integrity of BCCI's governance structure.