Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-04-15

STATE OF KARNATAKA vs JANTHAKAL ENTERPRISES

Citation / case number
SC 2009/33568
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF KARNATAKA
Respondent
JANTHAKAL ENTERPRISES
Author
R.V. RAVEENDRAN,A.K. PATNAIK, , ,
Bench
R.V. RAVEENDRAN,A.K. PATNAIK, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of a mining lease renewal under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, and the Environment Protection Act, 1986. It held that the first respondent's mining activities post-1985 were unauthorized due to the lack of necessary clearances as mandated by Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act. The Court emphasized that any permissions obtained through fraudulent means, such as the fake letter dated 14.2.2008, cannot legitimize illegal mining operations, thereby upholding the need for compliance with environmental regulations.

STATE OF KARNATAKA vs JANTHAKAL ENTERPRISES · Niyam