UNION OF INDIA vs B. KISHORE

The Supreme Court held that the Madras High Court erred in its interpretation of the compassionate appointment scheme, emphasizing that indigence is a prerequisite for such appointments as per the guidelines. The Court clarified that the mere existence of a pension does not negate the need for compassionate appointment if the family is in distress. The Court overturned the High Court's decision, ruling that the respondent's claim for compassionate appointment was not justified under the scheme's criteria.