Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-04-20

B.M.Narayana Gowda vs Shanthamma(D) By Lrs And Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2012 SC (SUPP) 264
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
B.M.Narayana Gowda
Respondent
Shanthamma(D) By Lrs And Anr
Bench
Deepak Verma, Dalveer Bhandari

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court emphasized that in first appeals, the High Court must comprehensively examine both questions of fact and law, as established in Sanjay Singh Rawat v. National Small Industries Corpn. Ltd. and H.K.N. Swami v. Irshad Basith. The Court held that the High Court's failure to provide cogent reasons or findings in the impugned judgment was unsatisfactory, warranting the remand of the case for fresh consideration. The appeal was allowed, and the High Court was directed to hear the matter expeditiously while maintaining the status quo.

B.M.Narayana Gowda vs Shanthamma(D) By Lrs And Anr · Niyam