Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-04-08

Ameer Chand vs Nirmal Chand

Citation / case number
AIR 2011 SUPREME COURT 3297
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Ameer Chand
Respondent
Nirmal Chand
Bench
Deepak Verma, Dalveer Bhandari

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the offence can be compounded if the complainant does not wish to prosecute the case and the entire amount due has been paid. The Court set aside the impugned judgment of the lower courts and allowed the compounding of the offence, emphasizing that this serves the ends of justice. The appeal was disposed of with directions allowing the complainant to withdraw the deposited amount.

Ameer Chand vs Nirmal Chand · Niyam