Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-04-26

Mrityunjoy Sett(D) By Lrs vs Jadunath Basak (D) By Lrs

Citation / case number
AIR 2011 SUPREME COURT 2496
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Mrityunjoy Sett(D) By Lrs
Respondent
Jadunath Basak (D) By Lrs
Author
Deepak Verma
Bench
Deepak Verma, Dalveer Bhandari

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Notice of eviction served under Section 13(6) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 was invalid as it did not provide the respondent with one month's clear notice for vacating the premises, which is a prerequisite under the Act. The Court emphasized that the tenancy was governed by the Bengali calendar month, contrary to the appellant's assertion of the English calendar month. Consequently, the Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of the ejectment suit on the grounds of defective notice, despite acknowledging the appellant's bona fide need for the premises.

Mrityunjoy Sett(D) By Lrs vs Jadunath Basak (D) By Lrs · Niyam