U. Sowri Reddy (Dead)By Lrs vs B. Suseelamma & Ors

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in setting aside the trial court's order allowing the appellant's application to set aside the sale of property under Order 21 Rule 90 CPC. The Court emphasized that the High Court failed to consider the deposit of Rs.18,000 made by the appellant in compliance with the trial court's order. The Court ruled that the High Court's interference under Section 115 CPC was unjustified, thereby allowing the appeal and reinstating the trial court's decision.