Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-04-18

Harjit Singh Uppal vs Anup Bansal

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Harjit Singh Uppal
Respondent
Anup Bansal
Author
R.M. Lodha
Bench
R.M. Lodha, Aftab Alam

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 13(2)(i) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, if a tenant fails to appeal against the order fixing provisional rent within 15 days, that order becomes final and cannot be challenged later in eviction proceedings. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory timelines for appeals, thereby reinforcing the principle of finality in rent control matters. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower court's decision regarding the provisional rent.

Harjit Singh Uppal vs Anup Bansal · Niyam