Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2011

Supreme Court of India · 2011-04-19

Arumugam Servai vs State Of T.Nadu

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Arumugam Servai
Respondent
State Of T.Nadu
Author
Markandey Katju
Bench
Gyan Sudha Misra, Markandey Katju

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellants under Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities Act), 1989, for using derogatory terms against members of a Scheduled Caste. The Court emphasized that insults based on caste are unacceptable in modern society and constitute an offense under the SC/ST Act. The Court affirmed the findings of the lower courts, stating that the use of the term 'pallapayal' was intended to insult and thus warranted conviction.

Arumugam Servai vs State Of T.Nadu · Niyam