Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-09-23

HIRABAI vs L.A.O. CUM ASST. COMMNR.

Citation / case number
SC 2003/2221
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HIRABAI
Respondent
L.A.O. CUM ASST. COMMNR.
Author
Mukundakam Sharma
Bench
MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA,ANIL R. DAVE, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court allowed the substitution of legal representatives for deceased appellants and addressed interconnected appeals regarding land acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court upheld the High Court's enhancement of compensation for irrigated lands to Rs. 75,600 per acre and dry lands to Rs. 38,000 per acre, rejecting the appellants' contention that the High Court improperly applied the capitalization method for valuation. The Court found no merit in the appellants' claims regarding the valuation process and upheld the High Court's decisions.

HIRABAI vs L.A.O. CUM ASST. COMMNR. · Niyam