Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-09-09

Competition Commission Of India vs Steel Authority Of India & Anr

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Competition Commission Of India
Respondent
Steel Authority Of India & Anr
Author
Swatanter Kumar
Bench
Swatanter Kumar, K.S. Radhakrishnan, S.H. Kapadia

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court allowed the application for leave to appeal, emphasizing the need for robust competition laws in India to replace the outdated Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969. The Court highlighted that the primary objective of competition law is to prevent anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominance, thereby ensuring a free market economy that promotes economic efficiency and consumer welfare. The judgment underscores the importance of adapting competition laws in response to global economic developments and the necessity of maintaining market integrity.

Competition Commission Of India vs Steel Authority Of India & Anr · Niyam