Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-09-24

B.V.Nagesh & Anr vs H.V.Sreenivasa Murthy

Citation / case number
2010 AIR SCW 6184
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
B.V.Nagesh & Anr
Respondent
H.V.Sreenivasa Murthy
Bench
B.S.Chauhan, P. Sathasivam

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's judgment in a regular first appeal under Section 96 CPC was cryptic and failed to address all factual details and legal grounds raised by the parties. The Court emphasized that Order XLI Rule 31 CPC mandates that the appellate judgment must state points for determination, decisions, and reasons for those decisions. Consequently, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment and remanded the case for fresh disposal, underscoring the importance of a thorough and reasoned approach in appellate proceedings.

B.V.Nagesh & Anr vs H.V.Sreenivasa Murthy · Niyam