Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-10-08

JOSE @ JOSEPH CHACKO vs V.M.JOSEPH

Citation / case number
SC 2010/23600
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
JOSE @ JOSEPH CHACKO
Respondent
V.M.JOSEPH
Author
HARJIT SINGH BEDI,CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, , ,
Bench
HARJIT SINGH BEDI,CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals and acquitted the appellant of the charges, holding that the offence was compounded. The Court clarified that the appellant must deposit Rs. 3 lakhs within six months as part of the loan repayment, failing which the appeals would be deemed dismissed. This decision underscores the principle that compounding of offences can lead to acquittal if the conditions are met.

JOSE @ JOSEPH CHACKO vs V.M.JOSEPH · Niyam