Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-10-08

SRI RAMAKRISHNA MUTT REP.BY MANAGER. vs M.MAHESWARAN .

Citation / case number
SC 2007/7892
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SRI RAMAKRISHNA MUTT REP.BY MANAGER.
Respondent
M.MAHESWARAN .
Author
V.S. SIRPURKAR
Bench
V.S. SIRPURKAR,CYRIAC JOSEPH, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the unanimous verdict of the lower courts, affirming that Kumudammal became the absolute owner of the property under Section 14(1) of The Hindu Succession Act, 1956, as she was in possession of the property when the Act came into force on 17.6.1956. The Court rejected the appellant's claim that Kumudammal's possession was not valid since Kannabiran Pillai was alive at that time, emphasizing that the widow's possession sufficed for her to acquire full ownership rights. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower courts' decisions.

SRI RAMAKRISHNA MUTT REP.BY MANAGER. vs M.MAHESWARAN . · Niyam