Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-10-18

RAJ KUMAR vs AJAY KUMAR

Citation / case number
SC 2007/13111
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAJ KUMAR
Respondent
AJAY KUMAR
Author
R.V. RAVEENDRAN,H.L. GOKHALE, , ,
Bench
R.V. RAVEENDRAN,H.L. GOKHALE, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeal challenging the High Court's judgment regarding compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Court emphasized that compensation must fully restore the claimant to their pre-accident position, citing principles from C. K. Subramonia Iyer vs. T. Kunhikuttan Nair and R. D. Hattangadi vs. Pest Control (India) Ltd. The Court held that the assessment of monthly income and deductions for personal expenses were erroneous, warranting an increase in compensation awarded for loss of earnings and future medical expenses.

RAJ KUMAR vs AJAY KUMAR · Niyam