V.ANJANEYULU vs STATE OF A.P.

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, confirming that the evidence presented, particularly from independent witness P.W. 2, established the delivery of bribe money for loan sanction. The Court emphasized that the recovery of tainted money from the accused raises a presumption under Section 20 of the Act, which the accused must rebut. The appeal was dismissed as the findings of the trial court and High Court were affirmed.