Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-10-29

Vijaysinh Chandubha Jadeja vs State Of Gujarat

Citation / case number
AIR 2011 SUPREME COURT 77
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Vijaysinh Chandubha Jadeja
Respondent
State Of Gujarat
Author
D.K. Jain
Bench
Deepak Verma, R.M. Lodha, Mukundakam Sharma, B. Sudershan Reddy, D.K. Jain

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court clarified the interpretation of Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, regarding the duty of the empowered officer to inform the suspect of their right to be searched in the presence of a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate. The Court held that a mere inquiry about the suspect's preference suffices as substantial compliance with Section 50, emphasizing that the essence of compliance is to make the suspect aware of their rights rather than adhering to a specific form. The judgment reconciled conflicting views from previous cases, affirming that the determination of compliance depends on the facts of each case.

Vijaysinh Chandubha Jadeja vs State Of Gujarat · Niyam