Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-10-22

State Of Punjab & Anr. Etc vs Viney Kumar Khullar & Ors. Etc

Citation / case number
AIR 2011 SC (SUPP) 381
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of Punjab & Anr. Etc
Respondent
Viney Kumar Khullar & Ors. Etc
Author
R.V.Raveendran
Bench
H L Gokhale, R V Raveendran

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the legality of the Government of Punjab's prospectus for admission to post graduate medical courses, specifically focusing on the allocation of seats and the requirement of a No Objection Certificate (NOC) for in-service doctors. The Court held that the amendments made in the government circular regarding the bond amount and service duration for in-service doctors were valid and did not violate any statutory provisions. The Court emphasized that the requirement of an NOC is a legitimate condition for ensuring that government resources are utilized effectively, thereby upholding the provisions of the prospectus and the circulars issued under it.

State Of Punjab & Anr. Etc vs Viney Kumar Khullar & Ors. Etc · Niyam