Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2010

Supreme Court of India · 2010-10-06

Ram Chander Talwar & Anr vs Devender Kumar Talwar & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2011 SC (CIVIL) 923
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Ram Chander Talwar & Anr
Respondent
Devender Kumar Talwar & Ors
Bench
R.M. Lodha, Aftab Alam

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that Section 45ZA(2) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 does not confer ownership of the deposited money to the nominee but merely grants the nominee the right to receive the amount, which remains part of the deceased depositor's estate and subject to succession laws. The Court affirmed the High Court's decision, referencing V.N. Khanchandani & Anr. v. V.L. Khanchandani & Anr., (2000) 6 SCC 724, establishing that the nominee's rights do not exclude the claims of legal heirs. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the principle that nomination does not equate to ownership.

Ram Chander Talwar & Anr vs Devender Kumar Talwar & Ors · Niyam